The Hunchback of Notre Dame
Posted by martinteller on March 30, 2011
Knucklehead that I am, I’ve never read any Victor Hugo, but having seen Bernard’s adaptation of “Les Miserables” and now Dieterle’s adaptation of this, I have no doubt that his reputation is well-deserved. A powerful tale that touches on so many themes (no doubt many of them watered down for the film): prejudice, religious fanaticism, ethnic persecution, the power of the press, unrequited love. Laughton is captivating as Quasimodo… in my experience, the man can do no wrong. It is a very compelling combination of the grotesque (and I don’t just mean physically, although the makeup job is wonderful) and the pitiable. An expensive production, but one that pays off, with its sets used to wonderful effect, aided by some glorious shots from cinematographer Joseph August. The photographic aspects really helped make up for some of the flaws. Maureen O’Hara does very little for me here, either as an actress or as the type of woman who would arouse so much passion. And there’s an occasional lack of subtlety, especially in some of the all too-knowing dialogue. And Frollo is perhaps too villainous to take seriously, although he does have some nuances. These are relatively minor quibbles, however. I really enjoyed this, and as a big noir fan I’m surprised to find it ranks as my favorite by Dieterle. Rating: 9
